crabber-net / crabber

A Twitter clone written in Python + Flask with extended features and a focus on inclusivity.
https://crabber.net
GNU General Public License v2.0
48 stars 16 forks source link

Update TOS to explicitly ban sysmeds and exclusionists #116

Closed hasrock36 closed 3 years ago

hasrock36 commented 3 years ago

Over the past few days Crabber has become a bit of a safe space for systems coming in from other platforms, but now we're being followed by the very people we left other platforms because of. To really set Crabber apart and to help safeguard the systems that have joined I suggest banning sysmeds outright

RusanyaCollective commented 3 years ago

Agreed. 👍

Being endogenic (a system formed by something other than trauma) is first and foremost a belief, even ignoring the fact psychology is only interested in that which it can pathologize.

You also can't tell us, an endogenic, that we don't exist when we are typing here as you read.

The idea that we are just "not remembering" trauma doesn't work when we already know all of our demons. We check and recheck several times in a month (no thanks to sysmedicalists and anti-endos in particular for this one) and have yet to find anything over the two or three years that we have known about our existence.

We do not owe you our life story to gain some pithy form of "validation" that can be revoked if we so much as step on the mat instead of the path of eggshells these anti-endos have laid bare.

Being anti-endogenic, by way of hating endogenic people for the act of existing, breathing, and talking about our own realities, are bigots — ableists in particular — and should be treated on the same level of other ableists: by banning them, and deplatforming them.

EDITED for minor typos.

hqnna commented 3 years ago

I'm fine with this change, poking @jakeledoux to get their opinion on it.

ImSerei commented 3 years ago

well doesnt "be respectful to users" and "no hateful ideology" in the TOS cover it already

RusanyaCollective commented 3 years ago

well doesnt "be respectful to users" and "no hateful ideology" in the TOS cover it already

Yes, generally, but unfortunately most people aren't even aware this is an issue, so having it be explicitly in the ToS might be more helpful ioo.

Source: we're an endogenic who has been the target of Twitter harassment campaigns...for being g endogenic and defending our existence

//not mad

jakeledoux commented 3 years ago

I briefly addressed this on Discord earlier and you can see my message here:

Screen Shot 2021-10-25 at 4 57 08 PM

In short: Hate speech and harassment already is against the TOS. Please report any rule-breaking accounts to contact@crabber.net and I will do my best to take care of it.

hqnna commented 3 years ago

I would also like people to keep this molt in mind when discussing this, not everyone has knowledge about sysmedicalism and plurality, etc, so adding specific things like this would be confusing to some.