Open Teslaxxx opened 6 months ago
What is the full output that gave you the original 0xE0E0E01F ?
You can see in tests that we are confident that sending the data will be received the same, given default parameters https://github.com/crankyoldgit/IRremoteESP8266/blob/a295f87e067bc8ccb22523ef035a05ea11d65e49/test/ir_Samsung_test.cpp#L123
Maybe you can post full output from the dump program, (as requested in the issue template)
Yes, that's right, I was sending lowercase letters, not capital letters , I thought they were the same because we send hex code
If this is in code, then it is your compiler that deals with 0x.. to be converted to integer. You might have a compiler that does this differently, but that's unlikely, ther emust be something else, or are you sending this as text somewhere?
Can you please post the minimalist code that reproduces the issue you have? We are fairly confident the library is correct, and we suspect you're doing something incorrect in your code. Please also supply the output of the IRrecvDumpV3 program too. That will give us all the info about the physical signal you created.
Version/revision of the library used
v2.8.6
Describe the bug
when store signal of 32 bits of Samsung that read by irrecv.decode(&results) function , then when sending that signal by irsend.sendSAMSUNG(0xE0E0E01F, 32 ); then read it by irrecv.decode(&results) function again , the results not same between signal i store and signal i send please help me thanks