I heard there was a c4m_path_split to wrap, but I don't see it, so I've omitted that for now.
util/wrappers.c probably isn't the best place for high(). Please let me know if we want it somewhere else. The existing include/util/math.h or src/adts/numbers.c didn't seem quite right.
I've based this PR on top of main rather than jtv/parity-push. There's currently no merge conflict. But I'm happy to target jtv/parity-push instead, if we prefer that.
The chalk spec and config files use these, and my understanding is that we want them as language builtins.
Refs: #94
I'm happy to implement some other builtins. But I wanted to double-check first which ones would be good for right now.
I've deliberately not implemented
low()in this PR because:print(low())in the tests produces-'..--).0-*(+,))+(0(, not-9223372036854775808(refs https://github.com/crashappsec/libcon4m/issues/72).I heard there was a
c4m_path_splitto wrap, but I don't see it, so I've omitted that for now.util/wrappers.cprobably isn't the best place forhigh(). Please let me know if we want it somewhere else. The existinginclude/util/math.horsrc/adts/numbers.cdidn't seem quite right.I've based this PR on top of
mainrather thanjtv/parity-push. There's currently no merge conflict. But I'm happy to targetjtv/parity-pushinstead, if we prefer that.