Closed jsign closed 1 year ago
As an extra double check of this, I ran a version that also had the "old way" and checked that both this unfolding style ended up with the same g0
and b0
values as the "iterative style".
Obviously, that code isn't in this PR because that is doing double work... but mentioning that I've also ran the code that way to detect "on the fly" if both logics were matching in the end result.
This PR is doing some unfolding of the scalars to calculate the final basis.