Closed Juliabrungs closed 4 years ago
Regarding this issue, this is the current language on the vouching form. I think this was updated by @claudioruiz months ago What field do you think we need to clarify?
Hi Hugo,
I think this is fine actually. It seems that the problems I have encountered with this stem from the pre-claudio review time. Maybe we can add in brackets after the accepting and rejection options - (you will need to provide a reason below). Or does this make it too clunky?
I think it should be fine. If we run into problems again we can review this. Best, Julia
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:44 PM Hugo Solar notifications@github.com wrote:
Regarding this issue, this is the current language on the vouching form. I think this was updated by @claudioruiz https://github.com/claudioruiz months ago What field do you think we need to clarify?
[image: Screen Shot 2020-05-12 at 2 42 14 PM] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/894708/81732703-dd5e4180-945e-11ea-960b-50197e142dc7.png
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/creativecommons/commoners/issues/393#issuecomment-627523351, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOMXDNW5VHD6PDPUIP3TQRDRRGKHHANCNFSM4MDWZ4FQ .
-- Julia Brungs Network Manager Creative Commons @Julia_Brungs Julia@creativecommons.org Calendar: https://calendly.com/juliabrungs
Form updated
There is some text clarification needed. When voucher vote 'no' it should specify in brackets that they don't want this person to join the Network and they need to provide a reason why. When vouchers vote 'cannot' it should specify in brackets that this means that they might not know the person or have other reasons why they do not want to vouch for the person.