search

credo-science / credo-webapp

Credo web application
MIT License
2 stars 6 forks source link

priority list discussion #24

Closed piotrhomola closed 6 years ago

piotrhomola commented 6 years ago

can we have a priority list of the issues being resolved or to be resolved? Some things are certainly more important than the others - we then should discuss what & when. E.g. currently I'd propose to assign the highest priority to the issue #23 (static filter), this is both science and societal - we can't score the championships without this or similar solution enabling disregarding the background signal. Thanks!

piotrhomola commented 6 years ago

proposed priority list (maybe I'd change it if time consuming / difficulty is evaluated for each issue):

  1. 23

  2. 25

  3. 26

  4. 22

  5. 19

  6. 21

    What do you think?

mpawlik commented 6 years ago

So we're left with:

  1. 23

  2. 25

    I think we can work on them simultaneously. I'm closing this issue, as the issue seems to be solved.

piotrhomola commented 6 years ago

Ok for now, but the idea of a priority list and corresponding discussion was addressing a long term perspective: any time we will have many issues open in parallel it would be good to be able to prioritize somehow, but since we have many points of view: development engineering, science, pr, legal,... we might often need a discussion. The recent weeks made this need clear to me - the most important issues from my point of view are handled as the last ones, without discussion or explanation. Doing this way also in future would reduce performance and scientific efficiency of the Collaboration. I'd be completely fine with delaying my issues if I'm only told at least a bit of explanation, and given a chance to discuss. It works like that with single issues: if you are not sure the request is needed you ask for clarification, this is how it should also work with priorities, if you do not agree with this let us discuss :)

W dniu wtorek, 19 czerwca 2018 Maciej Pawlik notifications@github.com napisał(a):

So we're left with:

  1. 23 https://github.com/credo-science/credo-webapp/issues/23

  2. 25 https://github.com/credo-science/credo-webapp/issues/25

    I think we can work on them simultaneously. I'm closing this issue, as the issue seems to be solved.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/credo-science/credo-webapp/issues/24#issuecomment-398414917, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ahue6XJWWczSJ6kvudvpw1ANB-Rfy8F-ks5t-QfpgaJpZM4Ua-Cy .

mpawlik commented 6 years ago

Just to clear things up, some tasks were in progress at the time when list was created.

piotrhomola commented 6 years ago

Ok

W dniu środa, 20 czerwca 2018 Maciej Pawlik notifications@github.com napisał(a):

Just to clear things up, some tasks were in progress at the time when list was created.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/credo-science/credo-webapp/issues/24#issuecomment-398712736, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Ahue6VafuRajUwfs4bJ8xDY0l-uiljhKks5t-i3LgaJpZM4Ua-Cy .