Closed corinwagen closed 1 year ago
Sure, --gfn0
exists, but keep in mind that GFN-FF often has comparable accuracy to GFN0 and is of course faster.
That's fair enough! Didn't realize --gfn0
was an option, thanks for clarifying. Thanks for all your work on this program.
This is a feature request.
Based on the documentation it appears you can use
--gfn1
,--gfn2
, or-gfnff
to select usage of GFN1, GFN2, or GFNFF methods fromxtb
. Would it be possible to add support for GFN0 for cases where a higher level of accuracy than GFNFF is desired but GFN2 is too slow?best, Corin