Closed camKD closed 5 months ago
The actual error seems to come from xtb
rather than CREST according to the printout you gave.
It doesn't give much clues what went wrong though.
Could you update the CREST version? If the error comes from some IO communication issue between xtb
and CREST this might fix it already.
This issue had no activity for 6 months. It will be closed in 1 week unless there is some new activity.
Hello,
I have been having a problem with the conformational search in CREST 2.11.2. I am running on an HPC system. These are the relevant jobscript settings and CREST command:
Here is the error from the workload manager:
I get the forrtl warnings on my other successful runs too, so it's just the last line. I've tried giving the job more memory but it doesn't seem to help. This is the structure:
39 energy: -79.160423784689 gnorm: 0.000047084974 xtb: 6.4.1 (afa7bdf) S -3.22242898358865 1.86624549650045 0.95973111981941 O 1.11843802803039 -0.41217482748083 -0.98762595314828 O 0.36514548550572 -0.19143049017688 1.71780675309701 O 4.94273512013157 -0.56379004198131 1.87926752628556 O -3.69911221284608 1.01370438789525 -0.30187337403880 O 4.82623331307138 2.40089550006547 -1.83366598808825 O -5.09065147490553 -1.23464480555800 -0.93672927698338 O -4.56736166641246 2.67185891274995 1.17878560161166 O -2.22557022084221 2.79894937390847 0.56302321308162 O -3.01770240116444 1.02801889905010 2.07842090743624 C 0.85011214358979 -1.41546910593597 1.22977461856343 C 0.52437223487039 -1.47966965192930 -0.27786599551148 C 2.36693881321128 -1.53892982640853 1.39070342747317 C 3.02866579204084 -0.52618778896916 0.49774753565134 C -0.96482434864484 -1.42953248479404 -0.49991231503740 C 2.35554275248836 -0.00732460474334 -0.60363772198316 C 4.30568949794638 -0.04523170612150 0.79051126864388 C -1.64305848903824 -0.22797908686279 -0.33331649025262 C 2.94574824382146 0.97795891568245 -1.39210404593473 C -1.67994900357658 -2.57140247775845 -0.82496647042147 C 4.90222969896796 0.92417678179862 0.00239018028617 C 4.21316303694094 1.44266475456952 -1.08845883330636 C -3.01439022362505 -0.17328367767369 -0.48044116423360 C -3.05358914098809 -2.51641071891780 -0.98124046761686 C -3.74398917991484 -1.32394604149622 -0.80449034171914 H 0.34013550457740 -2.26000473644541 1.72239503915514 H 0.92327186230684 -2.43209495498307 -0.66411142039108 H 2.68926192435478 -2.55263264256348 1.13669053790332 H 2.66126814897895 -1.35198202458989 2.42598655908830 H -1.10632364634983 0.66863340249551 -0.07221505566063 H 2.39067157616170 1.36712698018965 -2.23181831730131 H -1.16851805010017 -3.51304862077421 -0.95782291406399 H 0.55890521769772 -0.11971326587921 2.65763898405348 H 5.89114501400674 1.29539400359057 0.22453276350734 H -3.60476768540061 -3.41245274385650 -1.23304712234879 H 5.80254688162243 -0.13673640719272 1.97291613121245 H 4.23305126875789 2.68433140241295 -2.53962691476812 H -5.45390682525277 -2.10239201676253 -1.15588838978902 H -4.61832800643456 3.39570593894523 0.55263640572912
These same settings work fine for two other similar structures, the main difference being that this one has a sulfur atom. Could that be the problem? Perhaps that's too simple. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!!!!