Closed J08nY closed 1 year ago
@J08nY Can this be incorporated also into local development? I.e. can we create a pre-commit task for this? It's uncomfortable to discover failing pipelines only when they get to remote.
Well you can track code coverage when running tests. I do not think it makes sense to include anything based on that to a pre-commit. Otherwise every commit would run the test suite, I think that should not happen and be separate. If you want to look at the coverage diff you can check codecov manually, or just push and see the pipeline results.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #292 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage ? 73.25% ======================================= Files ? 45 Lines ? 5580 Branches ? 0 ======================================= Hits ? 4087 Misses ? 1493 Partials ? 0 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crocs-muni). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crocs-muni):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.