Closed jbw976 closed 4 years ago
@jbw976 looks like this is having trouble building. I am AFK but it looks like this is using a newer build
commit hash than other providers, so not sure if that is related. I'll take a closer look later on today if you don't get to it first :)
yes @hasheddan i think this would require a newer version of the build submodule after https://github.com/upbound/build/pull/95. This repo is currently using https://github.com/upbound/build/tree/317820ea3e6f9362e62654f31a0bcdb3947de3e3, which is older than that commit.
I am of the belief that you should continue enjoying your time off, and not mess with this 🤪
I've pushed a commit to this PR to update the build submodule to https://github.com/upbound/build/tree/6224f247a26b91305dc185fdc99cb35579bad79c, the exact same version that provider-{aws, azure, gcp}
are all using :)
Description of your changes
The storage of outputs to s3 is not needed by provider repos. Their important artifact is the container image which will still be published to dockerhub.
This is a similar issue that previously affected the other providers in https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/issues/1320
Checklist
I have:
make reviewable
to ensure this PR is ready for review.app.yaml
to include any new role permissions.