Closed haarchri closed 2 years ago
Is there any update on reviewing haarchri's pull requests? They un-break several broken resources.
Any progress on this? We also try using SecurityGroup and SecurityGroupRule together and get the same bug as in #157
i will update shortly the PR
updated the pr and removed ingress / egress from spec - because fields not needed because we have SecurityGroupRule Resource
NAME READY SYNCED EXTERNAL-NAME AGE
securitygrouprule.ec2.aws.jet.crossplane.io/sample-egress-sgr True True sgrule-2184305446 4m27s
securitygrouprule.ec2.aws.jet.crossplane.io/sample-sgr True True sgrule-4026632647 4m27s
NAME READY SYNCED EXTERNAL-NAME AGE
securitygroup.ec2.aws.jet.crossplane.io/sample-sg True True sg-0be6bc2861968b8b1 5m31s
Any chance to get this reviewed and hopefully approved and merged @muvaf? :)
added a preview image from master(https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/provider-jet-aws/commit/4828ea6e33810604435d1b13de4f31138034e670) + https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/provider-jet-aws/pull/198 + https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/provider-jet-aws/pull/211 +https://github.com/crossplane-contrib/provider-jet-aws/pull/208 available under: haarchri/provider-jet-aws:v0.5.0-preview
Signed-off-by: haarchri chhaar30@googlemail.com
Description of your changes
securitygroup
standalone and add rules viasecuritygrouprule
resourceFixes #157
I have:
make reviewable test
to ensure this PR is ready for review.How has this code been tested
ingress:
egress: