Open franco27 opened 4 years ago
Thanks, I will look into it. But it takes a time because I have a lot of feature requests.
Hello Don't worry, I'll wait. No emergency on my side.
But I find that this translation engine offers a good translation overall.
Unlike Promt or Naver papago, where I was very disappointed with the quality of their translations. Which is pretty bad.
Should be done on the QOnlineTranslator side.
Another proprietary translator, that is using insecure TLS 1.0. In future it will stop working in web browsers, and, I suppose, already doesn't work in OpenSSL (which is dependency of QNetwork).
It response with web page, not json. Also, requests is stupid as f*ck: used indexes instead of lang code. And url should contains: /source_language/to-translate_language
.
Hello There is another translation engine that I like and that offers good translation quality. I use it when the translation of Deepl, Google or Bing disappoints me or when I think there is a bad translation. And generally Babylon Translate gives me a better translation.
I was wondering if you could add Babylon (after Deepl). I think it was possible to add it because QTranslate included Babylon Translate.
He was very helpful in translating the different languages for the French translation of Crow Translate. Almost all the time mistakes with Google or Bing.