search

crs-tools / tracker

CRS Ticket Tracker
Apache License 2.0
18 stars 11 forks source link

Public Version: Contributor License Agreement #130

Open a-tze opened 8 years ago

a-tze commented 8 years ago

Issue migrated from trac ticket # 130

component: unknown | priority: major

2016-01-18 02:17:02: @jjeising created the issue

We probably want a CLA.

Examples maybe 1 and 2. There is also 3 with nice Github Autofill.

Comments on that topic?

a-tze commented 8 years ago

2016-03-02 19:25:17: @a-tze commented

What will be the license of the Public Version actually?

a-tze commented 8 years ago

2016-03-02 19:31:50: @jjeising commented

This should be the question of another issue. Currently Apache seems most feasible.

a-tze commented 7 years ago

2017-03-05 11:46:21: @pegro commented

Which legal entity is then the "The Company" part of the CLA?

a-tze commented 7 years ago

2017-03-06 01:17:39: @jjeising commented

Which legal entity is then the "The Company" part of the CLA?

That's a very good question. A GbR is probably the most feasible. (Gemeinnütze) Stiftung would feel a little better, but seems to require significant financial capital. The GbR requires naming all associates, which goes against the idea of a flexible legal entity which just manages rights. It's complicated?