Open AliSajid opened 1 year ago
I'm not sure I want to use semantic releases and conventional commits. We already have a CHANGELOG, adhering to keep a changelog, which allows more freedom of expression than an automatically generated changelog. Similarly, I feel like adhering too closely to a standard in commit messages just creates friction. So for now, I don't want to commit to using either of these conventions.
CI would however be great for testing, but right now it would require set up for SFML, which I am going to try to transition away from before 0.2.0.
I'm gonna try to wait with CI until the port to wgpu+winit is complete, which will make both distribution and CI easier.
I think it would be wise to wait for CI. I'd be happy to help in whatever capacity.
I'm gonna reopen this as a tracking issue for eventually implementing CI.
Due to lack of time to work on this project, I'm prioritizing working on features that I want, so I'm removing this from a 0.2 milestone. However, feel free to make a pull request for CI support.
I have a pretty decent CI System built in my tool repo. The actual tool is pretty simple but I have a few things running that:
I'd be happy to implement that in this in here.