Closed vincele closed 4 years ago
It looks like the spelling mistake in include/common/system.h
that makes the check-format
fail is not related to this PR...
Thanks for the PR!
Oh, thanks for pointing the spelling error out. codespell
doesn't actually cause the build to fail. The error is earlier (line 412 of the log):
FAIL: include/drivers/regulator.h (File size changed from 4619 to 4660)
because the return type is only followed by a newline for function definitions, not prototypes (this is what make format
would change):
diff --git a/include/drivers/regulator.h b/include/drivers/regulator.h
index 611049f..af1aeab 100644
--- a/include/drivers/regulator.h
+++ b/include/drivers/regulator.h
@@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ int regulator_disable(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
* @param id The device-specific identifier for this regulator.
* @return Zero on success; a defined error code on failure.
*/
-int
-regulator_enable(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
+int regulator_enable(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
/**
* Get generic information about a regulator.
@@ -75,8 +74,8 @@ regulator_enable(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
* @param id The device-specific identifier for this regulator.
* @return A pointer to the information structure.
*/
-struct regulator_info *
-regulator_get_info(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
+struct regulator_info *regulator_get_info(const struct device *dev,
+ uint8_t id);
/**
* Get the current state of a regulator, as determined from the hardware.
@@ -89,8 +88,7 @@ regulator_get_info(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
* @return On success, boolean true or false for if the regulator is
* enabled; a defined error code on failure.
*/
-int
-regulator_get_state(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
+int regulator_get_state(const struct device *dev, uint8_t id);
/**
* Get the current value of a regulator. If the regulator is disabled, this
Ah yes, the red in codespell made me stop looking further, also it was late.
I formatted the code with make format
before resending, and made a better commit message.
Does it look good now ?
Merged as c766a17905e050a714fc6ca16a05e13bccac1118
This is only a RFC, if this is OK, I'll do the other items mentionned in the issue.
It compiles but otherwise untested (I've no suitable HW)
See #171