Problem: sdk 0.50 is not used

[mmsqe]

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

• [ ] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• [ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• [ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• [ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• [ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• [ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• [ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• [ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• [ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• [ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• [ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• [ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• [ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

[socket-security[bot]]

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1, pypi/pyyaml@6.0.1

View full report↗︎

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.52747% with 125 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.16%. Comparing base (7598bc4) to head (ea539c1).

Files	Patch %	Lines
app/export.go	9.37%	28 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
app/versiondb.go	0.00%	15 Missing :warning:
testutil/app.go	70.83%	10 Missing and 4 partials :warning:
x/chainmain/client/cli/testnet.go	0.00%	13 Missing :warning:
app/app.go	95.23%	6 Missing and 3 partials :warning:
cmd/chain-maind/app/app.go	82.85%	4 Missing and 2 partials :warning:
testutil/base_test_suite.go	90.16%	3 Missing and 3 partials :warning:
app/genesis.go	0.00%	5 Missing :warning:
x/nft/simulation/operations.go	0.00%	4 Missing :warning:
app/upgrades.go	25.00%	2 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
... and 12 more

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1061 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 32.98% 36.16% +3.18% ========================================== Files 128 128 Lines 20009 16571 -3438 ========================================== - Hits 6600 5993 -607 + Misses 12353 9480 -2873 - Partials 1056 1098 +42 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `23.54% <67.05%> (+2.46%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_byzantine](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `10.99% <66.47%> (+1.04%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_gov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.23% <66.76%> (+0.94%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_grpc](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.22% <66.47%> (+0.92%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_ibc](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `28.23% <67.05%> (+3.07%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_ledger](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.21% <66.47%> (+1.02%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_slow](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.21% <66.47%> (+1.02%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_solomachine](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.03% <66.47%> (+1.05%)` | :arrow_up: | | [integration_tests_upgrade](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `11.22% <66.47%> (+0.92%)` | :arrow_up: | | [unit_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/chain-main/pull/1061/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | `10.88% <62.52%> (+0.44%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yihuang]

/runsim

[github-actions[bot]]

Simulation tests started and triggered by /runsim. Will update here when it succeeds or fails. Can further check progress here

[github-actions[bot]]

✅ /runsim simulation test has succeeded 🎉 Can further check here