mmsqe commented 4 months ago

check validity with extractSliceBytes to avoid copying slice data.

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

[ ] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
[ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
[ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
[ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
[ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
[ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
[ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
[ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
[ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
[ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
[ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
[ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
[ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Improved key comparison accuracy in the database iterator to enhance overall reliability.
- Enhanced efficiency by reducing unnecessary data copying during slice operations in the iterator.
Documentation
- Updated CHANGELOG to reflect recent improvements in slice data handling and efficiency enhancements.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

Walkthrough

The latest updates focus on enhancing the efficiency of key comparisons within the newRocksDBIterator and rocksDBIterator functions by replacing moveSliceToBytes with a more streamlined extractSliceBytes method. These changes aim to reduce the need for copying slice data, leading to more efficient handling of key comparisons in the RocksDB iterator.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`CHANGELOG.md`	Updated to reflect improvements in slice data handling within iterator and to enhance efficiency.
`versiondb/tsrocksdb/iterator.go`	Replaced `moveSliceToBytes` with `extractSliceBytes` in `newRocksDBIterator` and `rocksDBIterator` functions.

Poem

Amidst the code, a change does bloom,
A better way, dispelling gloom.
No copying here, efficiency shines,
In slice and bytes, streamlined lines.
Rocks in the DB, deftly compared,
A rabbit’s joy, this task well paired.

[!TIP]

Early access features: enabled
We are currently testing the following features in early access: - **OpenAI `gpt-4o` model for code reviews and chat**: OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. We seek your feedback over the next few weeks before making it generally available. Note: - You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file. - Please join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to provide feedback and report issues. - OSS projects are currently opted into early access features by default.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.87%. Comparing base (e877151) to head (50d5a4a).

Additional details and impacted files

[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1498/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=92w0Dz1Coj&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1498?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1498 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 17.54% 35.87% +18.33% =========================================== Files 87 136 +49 Lines 5273 9809 +4536 =========================================== + Hits 925 3519 +2594 - Misses 4238 5894 +1656 - Partials 110 396 +286 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1498?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [versiondb/tsrocksdb/iterator.go](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1498?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=versiondb%2Ftsrocksdb%2Fiterator.go&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain#diff-dmVyc2lvbmRiL3Rzcm9ja3NkYi9pdGVyYXRvci5nbw==) | `73.68% <85.71%> (ø)` | | ... and [71 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1498/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain)

crypto-org-chain / cronos