Problem: batch tx in benchmark is not necessary

[yihuang]

Solution:

• batch tx is rarely used in production, try to avoid in benchmark.
• normal async tx sending should be fast enough.

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

• [ ] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• [ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• [ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• [ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• [ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• [ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• [ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• [ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• [ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• [ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• [ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• [ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• [ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced transaction handling with improved error feedback for individual transactions.
  • Introduced batch processing of transactions, allowing multiple transactions to be sent in a single operation.

• Bug Fixes

  • Simplified function signatures for better clarity and consistency.

• Refactor

  • Removed unnecessary complexity related to batch transaction construction.
  • Reorganized code structure for improved readability while maintaining functionality.
  • Adjusted configuration settings for improved transaction processing and indexing capabilities.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the transaction handling functionality across the sendtx.py, utils.py, and peer.py files. The fund_test_accounts function has been simplified by removing the cli parameter. The send_transaction function has been redefined as send_transactions to handle multiple transactions in one call. Additionally, configuration constants related to transaction processing and indexing have been adjusted for improved performance.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
testground/benchmark/benchmark/sendtx.py, testground/benchmark/benchmark/utils.py	The fund_test_accounts function signature was modified to remove the cli parameter. The send_transaction function was renamed to send_transactions, allowing batch processing of transactions. The build_batch_tx function was removed, focusing solely on Ethereum transactions. The organization of functions within utils.py was also adjusted.
testground/benchmark/benchmark/peer.py	Configuration constants were modified: MEMPOOL_SIZE decreased to 10,000, consensus.timeout_commit reduced to 1 second, and new entries added for transaction indexing settings. Conditional logic for VALIDATOR_GROUP was removed.

Poem

🐇 In fields of code, we hop and play,
With transactions now, a smoother way.
No more batches for Cosmos to build,
Just Ethereum's path, our hearts are thrilled!
A simpler dance, a joyful cheer,
For every change, we hold so dear! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 15.24%. Comparing base (7a04a82) to head (a5f7054). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1558?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1558 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 15.24% 15.24% ======================================= Files 67 67 Lines 4874 4874 ======================================= Hits 743 743 Misses 4037 4037 Partials 94 94 ```

[mmsqe]

Do we need to prevent sender nonce could conflicts in funding?

[yihuang]

Do we need to prevent sender nonce could conflicts in funding?

no with the benchmark binary.

[mmsqe]

Do we need to prevent sender nonce could conflicts in funding?

no with the benchmark binary.

I rmb the chance of getting uniqueness error is higher when try async fund

[yihuang]

Do we need to prevent sender nonce could conflicts in funding?

no with the benchmark binary.

I rmb the chance of getting uniqueness error is higher when try async fund

that error message is expected for now with block-stm, the tx itself should be successful.