Problem: fail test is not reported in ci

[mmsqe]

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

For more info

PR Checklist:

• [ ] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
• [ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
• [ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
• [ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
• [ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
• [ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
• [ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
• [ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
• [ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
• [ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
• [ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
• [ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
• [ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced new testing targets for improved modularity: test-memiavl and test-store.
• Improvements
  • Enhanced build and testing processes with additional commands and conditional execution based on file changes.
  • Updated test commands to cover a broader scope, including objstore and rocksdb tags.
• Bug Fixes
  • Added checks to ensure the working directory is clean before proceeding with builds and tests.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the .github/workflows/build.yml and Makefile to enhance the build and testing processes. The workflow file updates the unittest, gomod2nix, and contracts jobs to include additional test commands and improve conditional execution based on file changes. The Makefile restructures test commands by adding new targets for specific directories and updating existing ones to enhance clarity and modularity.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml	Updated unittest job with new test commands; modified gomod2nix job to conditionally run steps based on changes; added checks for clean working directory in gomod2nix and contracts jobs.
Makefile	Introduced new test targets test-memiavl and test-store; updated test-versiondb to include -tags=objstore,rocksdb; modified .PHONY declaration to include new targets.

Possibly related PRs

• 1620: The changes in the Makefile to introduce new test targets for test-memiavl and test-store are related to the modifications in the memiavl codebase, specifically the ApplyChangeSets method in memiavl/db.go, as both involve enhancements to testing and functionality within the memiavl component.

Suggested reviewers

• calvinaco
• devashishdxt
• yihuang

Poem

In the garden of code, we hop and play,
New tests sprout up, brightening the day.
With clean checks in place, our builds take flight,
A joyful leap forward, all feels just right! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 17.72%. Comparing base (bd29fdf) to head (957dbbe). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (bd29fdf) and HEAD (957dbbe). Click for more details.

HEAD has 12 uploads less than BASE

| Flag | BASE (bd29fdf) | HEAD (957dbbe) | |------|------|------| ||2|0| |integration_tests|20|10|

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1622?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1622 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 36.86% 17.72% -19.15% =========================================== Files 102 72 -30 Lines 8059 5208 -2851 =========================================== - Hits 2971 923 -2048 + Misses 4710 4162 -548 + Partials 378 123 -255 ``` [see 47 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1622/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain)