yihuang commented 1 month ago

Solution:

use different recipient addresses

👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻

PR Checklist:

[ ] Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md?
[ ] Does your PR follow the C4 patch requirements?
[ ] Have you rebased your work on top of the latest master?
[ ] Have you checked your code compiles? (make)
[ ] Have you included tests for any non-trivial functionality?
[ ] Have you checked your code passes the unit tests? (make test)
[ ] Have you checked your code formatting is correct? (go fmt)
[ ] Have you checked your basic code style is fine? (golangci-lint run)
[ ] If you added any dependencies, have you checked they do not contain any known vulnerabilities? (go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)
[ ] If your changes affect the client infrastructure, have you run the integration test?
[ ] If your changes affect public APIs, does your PR follow the C4 evolution of public contracts?
[ ] If your code changes public APIs, have you incremented the crate version numbers and documented your changes in the CHANGELOG.md?
[ ] If you are contributing for the first time, please read the agreement in CONTRIBUTING.md now and add a comment to this pull request stating that your PR is in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin.

Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Resolved unexpected conflicts in benchmark transactions.
- Fixed issues with single validator benchmarks and node shutdown signals.
- Addressed multisig account failures and query issues for address-by-account-number.
Improvements
- Enhanced transaction generation by allowing dynamic sender addresses.
- Implemented parallel generation of test transactions on a single node.
- Added support for batch mode in benchmarks and improved load generation with error retries.
Documentation
- Updated CHANGELOG.md to reflect recent bug fixes and improvements.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the CHANGELOG.md and modifies the transaction.py file in the benchmark module. In CHANGELOG.md, entries are added under "Bug Fixes" and "Improvements" for both the unreleased version and v1.4.0-rc1, detailing fixes for benchmark transactions and enhancements in transaction handling. The transaction.py file sees changes in function signatures to allow dynamic sender addresses in transaction creation, improving flexibility in transaction management.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md	- Added bug fixes for benchmark transactions and improvements in transaction handling for unreleased and v1.4.0-rc1.
	- Notable entries include fixes for unexpected conflicts, transaction generation enhancements, and updates to memiavl.
testground/benchmark/benchmark/transaction.py	- Updated `simple_transfer_tx` and `erc20_transfer_tx` to include a `sender` parameter instead of a hardcoded recipient.

Possibly related PRs

#1650: Introduces batch transaction support in benchmarks, related to improvements in transaction handling.
#1651: Discusses improvements in transaction broadcasting efficiency using cometbft RPC, aligning with enhancements in transaction generation.

Suggested reviewers

devashishdxt
mmsqe
thomas-nguy

🐇 In the meadow, transactions flow,
With sender's choice, they brightly glow.
Bugs are fixed, improvements shine,
In the code, all works align.
Hops of joy, let changes ring,
For every fix, a rabbit's spring! 🐰✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 16.64%. Comparing base (9080ded) to head (a9a1eb3). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1652/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=92w0Dz1Coj&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/crypto-org-chain/cronos/pull/1652?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=crypto-org-chain) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1652 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 16.64% 16.64% ======================================= Files 72 72 Lines 6212 6212 ======================================= Hits 1034 1034 Misses 5055 5055 Partials 123 123 ```

crypto-org-chain / cronos

Problem: benchmark txs have unexpected conflicts #1652