cryptonomex / graphene

MIT License
1.05k stars 337 forks source link

forum or mailinglist? #688

Open Outstep opened 6 years ago

Outstep commented 6 years ago

Hello,

Is there a forum or mailing list for Graphene?

I know there are various forums for Bitshares, Steem, and EOS, but I am looking for something specifically for Graphene as I want to develop from the Graphene code-base.

Thanks

abitmore commented 6 years ago

Afaik, no.

This repository is no longer being maintained.

Outstep commented 6 years ago

Thanks for the information about the repository.

Is there somewhere I can download all of the Wiki documents as well so that I can start a fork of Graphene?

Thanks again

abitmore commented 6 years ago

git submodule update --init --recursive will pull the whole wiki into docs directory.

abitmore commented 6 years ago

Please be aware that, there are many fixes and improvements have been done in the projects forked from this repository, so IMHO it's best to follow those projects directly.

Outstep commented 6 years ago

Thanks for getting back to me.

I actually have been looking at Graphene based project like Steem, Bitshares, and EOS which seem to be using the Graphene core code and which I think originally was called Bitshares-1 but have now advanced their code bases over to Bitshares-2 with some improvements.

I also see that those projects, while good, have added many layers to the Graphene core code and, for example, have added the ideas of multiple coins (tokens) within the basic code (Steem has STEEM and Steem Power). I actually also really like Steem but am still trying to figure out if it is the est solution for my needs.

For my particular project, I am also looking for a crypto engine that is capable of extremely high transactions per second and read that Graphene has the capability to process 100,000 TPS (Network dependent of course). With that in mind, I was hoping to use a latest and viable version of Graphene which should be simpler to initially work with than to have all of the layered changes, but I cannot find any current Graphene fork that uses just 1 coin at the moment.

On a side question, what is the reason that the Graphene core is not being maintained and advanced any longer? I think that it's a GREAT product with great potential.

Cheers and have a great day, my friend, Lonnie

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Abit notifications@github.com wrote:

Please be aware that, there are many fixes and improvements have been done in the projects forked from this repository, so IMHO it's best to follow those projects directly.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/688#issuecomment-403455691, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXkxHl87GojxWnXlIOOLEz47LlgTgomkks5uE0ZWgaJpZM4VG5ij .

-- Thanks and have a great day,

Lonnie T. Cumberland, PhD. DIRECT: 313-333-2935 Email: Lonnie.Cumberland@Outstep.com

abitmore commented 6 years ago

any current Graphene fork that uses just 1 coin

The code in this repository originally supports creating multiple tokens/coins. If you want to disable that feature, you can

On a side question, what is the reason that the Graphene core is not being maintained and advanced any longer?

This repository was mainly created for BitShares. But this repository is owned by a private company, namely "CryptoNomex". The BitShares community decided to maintain and advance the code base under an organization account, https://github.com/bitshares.

You can search for stories about Daniel Larimer, BitShares, Steem and EOS.

Outstep commented 6 years ago

Thanks again and I will continue to do more research. I have beet been discussing Steem & Bitshares with some folks and it is truly a complex setup given the multiple coins/tokens STEEM & Steem Power that make things very confusing for the users which I was trying to minimize by somehow using a single coin approach.

One suggestion was that since the Steem Power (VESTS) can be hidden and used internally so that user is only aware of STEEM coins, and they suggest that Bitshares is doing something similar already. Maybe that is a pathway forward for me.

I will now dig into Bitshares more to see what may be done. Thanks again,

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Abit notifications@github.com wrote:

any current Graphene fork that uses just 1 coin

The code in this repository originally supports creating multiple tokens/coins. If you want to disable that feature, you can

On a side question, what is the reason that the Graphene core is not being maintained and advanced any longer?

This repository was mainly created for BitShares. But this repository is owned by a private company, namely "CryptoNomex". The BitShares community decided to maintain and advance the code base under an organization account, https://github.com/bitshares.

You can search for stories about Daniel Larimer, BitShares, Steem and EOS.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/688#issuecomment-403506959, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXkxHljf-TASMrz_axlTVV7vJQyJbfOcks5uE25lgaJpZM4VG5ij .

-- Thanks and have a great day,

Lonnie T. Cumberland, PhD. DIRECT: 313-333-2935 Email: Lonnie.Cumberland@Outstep.com