Open HertzDevil opened 3 weeks ago
The name is still not ideal because NilableReferenceUnionType
and NilableReferenceType
are pretty similar. Both inherit from UnionType
which doesn't help making sense of the only difference in the names.
Perhaps we can find an even better naming solution?
The name
NilableType
suggests that other types likeNilableReferenceUnionType
andNilableProcType
inherit from it, but this is not the case.