cs24 / volatility

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/volatility
0 stars 0 forks source link

Unknown vs UNKNOWN - consistency #193

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Does anyone have a preference whether we print Unknown or UNKNOWN in output? I 
don't, but would like them to be consistent across plugins. Right now we have:

./volatility/plugins/dlldump.py:                    mod_name = "Unknown"
./volatility/plugins/moddump.py:                mod_name = "Unknown"
./volatility/plugins/pstree.py:            task_info['image_file_name'] = 
task.ImageFileName or 'UNKNOWN'
./volatility/plugins/pstree.py:                task_info['Audit ImageFileName'] 
= task.SeAuditProcessCreationInfo.ImageFileName.Name or 'UNKNOWN'
./volatility/plugins/ssdt.py:                    syscall_name = "Unknown"
./volatility/plugins/ssdt.py:                    syscall_modname = "UNKNOWN"
./volatility/timefmt.py:            return "UNKNOWN"

OK maybe I'm being picky, but it looks a little messy ;-) 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by michael.hale@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 7:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
That's a tough call, it depends how weird it looks in the output.  I'd probably 
go for UNKNOWN to draw peoples eye to it (just so you know it's not the same as 
all the others), but equally I can imagine that looking really ugly/too much in 
certain plugins.  So I'm up for other opinions to help me make up my mind?

Original comment by mike.auty@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 8:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I think I'd go for "UNKNOWN" as well since it tends to catch your attention 
more.

Original comment by jamie.l...@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 3:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Cool, sounds like UNKNOWN is the winner. Btw Carl Pulley's stack plugin uses 
terminal coloring to draw people's eyes to certain things, but probably before 
we consider pretty colors let's finish the x64 and functionality. 

Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 3:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
This issue was closed by revision r1305.

Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2012 at 3:48