Closed cionx closed 10 months ago
The lambda calculus is currently defined as follows:
https://github.com/cs3110/textbook/blob/7b131977bcd587151bd700cd38ae83e72748a7fd/src/chapters/interp/substitution.md?plain=1#L668-L669
From what I understand, shouldn’t there also be an additional line for x ::= <identifier>?
x ::= <identifier>
I don't mind adding that, though I thought by that point it was clear from context.
The lambda calculus is currently defined as follows:
https://github.com/cs3110/textbook/blob/7b131977bcd587151bd700cd38ae83e72748a7fd/src/chapters/interp/substitution.md?plain=1#L668-L669
From what I understand, shouldn’t there also be an additional line for
x ::= <identifier>
?