Closed dragonchaser closed 1 year ago
@glpatcern
As I understand it, it is a CERN feature request to have two flags on each share
1) Accepted 2) Hidden
We already implemented it on the backend and the web client for the CERN merge.
@micbar not sure the two flags were understood to be independent, i.e. with the 4 combinations being meaningful. Anyway even assuming so, that still concerns the ReceivedShare
, not the Share
, right?
User story https://github.com/owncloud/web/issues/9531
Thanks, understood. I see the idea is also to observe adoption of those combinations and potentially simplify in the future.
With that, I think it's fine to add a hidden
bool field to the ReceivedShare
, next to (and indeed independent from) state
. The Share
structure/message should not be affected instead. Or do I miss something else?
I will move it to ReceivedShare
then....
I have set the PR to Draft for now, I want to make the necessary changes to reva/edge
and merge it at the same time to avoid larger breakage.
We have a PR for edge: https://github.com/cs3org/reva/pull/4256
@glpatcern if you want you can merge it :)
@diocas how did we implement hiding of shares in CERNBox without this?