Closed njasm closed 7 years ago
Interesting, I wasn't aware of this. Ill do some investigation to see what I need to change to make this work. Hopefully it is as simple as not sending any token but I suspect might not be.
So from what I've read this seems to not needed. Ill update the validation and test if it works as expected. For now you can use a private environment variable to set the token on travis ci settings to make this work. (this is a private hidden environment variable, not in the repo)
@csMACnz cool thanks for the heads up on the private environment var in travis. now I'm able to bypass this issue. now I just need to find why monocov is exporting an empty xml file..
thanks for the help.
If it helps, I have 2 example repositories that are working (nunit or xunit with travis and monocov).
https://github.com/csMACnz/Coveralls.net-Samples/tree/nunit-monocov-travisci https://github.com/csMACnz/Coveralls.net-Samples/tree/xunit-monocov-travisci
@csMACnz cool thanks, but I've ended up using nunit, openCover in appveyor. monocov apparently does not work anymore with latest versions of mono.
thanks for the help.
Perfect. I knew monocov was out of support so not surprised.
I am still holding out for a working Coverage solution on Linux myself. Once it exists, I will make sure i put together a sample of how it works.
command line syntax not clear: installing version 0.6.0 command executed :
how do you go with a public repo without leaking the coveralls token? Apparently Coveralls.io does not need repo token when submitting coverage for public repositories. reference : lemurheavy/coveralls-public#208