Open tschmidtb51 opened 2 years ago
Dear @tschmidtb51,
going back to the beginning of the project we defined in #4 how the conformance clause 5 has been specified for the project. You actually added the /document/lang
requirement way later as we already finished this area. We do not consider this as a bug, as the specification has been implemented as agreed during kick off.
Dear @cgi1,
I'm sorry for the confusion this caused. I know that this one is not in the scope of the original project. Therefore, I didn't label it with acceptance
.
However, I found it during my tests, so I wanted to document it to make sure, I don't forget about it before claiming officially conformance against clause 5.
Thank you @tschmidtb51 for clearing up the confusion here! It absolutly makes sense to add issues for later adoption of the code.
The basic idea could be to use XPath and get all xml:lang
elements as array and then process them.
And the XPath to get all xml:lang
elements is //@xml:lang
. That should result in an array.
I will start implementation today 🤞🏽
The conformance clause 5: CVRF CSAF converter states the conversion rule for the document language:
This must be implemented in the CVRF-CSAF converter to be conformant.