Closed kraghavk closed 2 years ago
Suggestion for the properties. In true DDD fashion, they need to be read-only (private setter). Could this work? It would drop the need for complex configuration of includes/excludes.
That would absolutely work and eliminate messy configuration.
On Sat, 19 Feb, 2022, 3:14 pm Dries, @.***> wrote:
Suggestion for the properties. In true DDD fashion, they need to be read-only (private setter). Could this work? It would drop the need for complex configuration of includes/excludes.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/csharpfritz/InstantAPIs/issues/2#issuecomment-1045979043, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJEA5X2BCBM4GOP6EAGPU3U35Q73ANCNFSM5OVD4MJA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I love the idea behind this project. This is great and I am looking forward to this becoming more mature, stable and famous!
The following configuration options might be required in a lot of cases:
Thanks, Raghu