Closed Madhu-1 closed 2 weeks ago
@Madhu-1 , the abbreviations make it really difficult to understand the explanation.
I don't understand why a VolumeGroupReplication
needs the VolumeReplicationClassName
, why is VolumeGroupReplicationClassName
not sufficient?
Or, should the VolumeReplicationClassName
not be a member of VolumeGroupReplicationClass
?
@Madhu-1 , the abbreviations make it really difficult to understand the explanation.
I don't understand why a
VolumeGroupReplication
needs theVolumeReplicationClassName
, why isVolumeGroupReplicationClassName
not sufficient?Or, should the
VolumeReplicationClassName
not be a member ofVolumeGroupReplicationClass
?
@nixpanic we have an option either to reuse the same group class for replication as well or introduce a new class field for the replication, IMO we should not make VolumeReplicationClassName as a member of VolumeGroupReplicationClass
we need to have a VRC name to create the VR, this PR adds a new field to the VGR to pass down the VRC name for the VolumeReplication object.