Poster Evaluation

[di-Tong]

Great poster and interesting project! The overall design layout is clear, clean and easily-understood with all necessary elements and without redundant content. The visualizations are beautiful and the color usage is consistent with the overall color pattern of the poster. One general suggestion for this poster (according to my own preference) is that a lot of content could be presented in a more concise and highlighted way with the help of subtitles, bullet points and Bold characters. For instance, in the research question and hypothesis section, you could add a subtitle “question:” and a subtitle “hypotheses:” for the two parts, and the question could be formulated in a more clear-cut and concise way like your title. The same is applied to the data and method section, e.g. adding “data:”, “research goal”. Another minor point is that it could be more helpful to demonstrate the relation between each section in a clearer way. To be specific, showing readers that challenge of dataset and leveraging XGBoost are sub-sections of Data and method. Besides, I find it more appropriate to distribute more space to demonstrate your findings, though I understand that your treatment of missing data could be considered as an important part of this project so it is necessary to let the readers get to know this part.

[sanittawan]

Thank you, Di! Great suggestions. I will definitely keep them in mind for my future posters!