Closed ghost closed 2 years ago
Please either rename the archive or update the migration instructions with a suggestion to rename the archive
All that the batik-rasterizer
module provides is a useless, obsolete policy file that no other module uses (svgrasterizer
has its own). No Java code at all. And if you look into that policy file, it is all-permission except for a js.jar
file that is not being built and does not exist. A nice example of code rot.
That's why I removed it. Then,
From point 5) in MIGRATING_FROM_BATIK
:
The generic rasterizer module (and related files) was removed
So it is already documented.
My questions: Why are you using it? Are you sure that you are actually making any use of a policy file that does not work?
I do not think that you need either rasterizer
nor svgrasterizer
. I'd suggest removing that dependency from your build and let's move on.
I'm putting the rasterizer
word in code font style in MIGRATING_FROM_BATIK
so it is easier to parse.
Weird. I thought I had a compile error because it couldn't be found. I've since removed it and the build succeeds.
Here are the imports for Batik:
Here are the imports for EchoSVG:
The IDE complains with:
Please either rename the archive or update the migration instructions with a suggestion to rename the archive (to
svgrasterizer
).