search

cstb / citygml-energy

CityGML Energy ADE
41 stars 9 forks source link

ThermalBoundarySurface Types #60

Closed RomainNouvel closed 8 years ago

RomainNouvel commented 8 years ago

The first goal of ThermalBoundarySurfaceType was to identify specific Thermal boundary surface typologies which are likely to have similar Constructions in a building (and possibly relate them with a construction library). Indeed, the unique use of BoundarySurfaceType for this purpose is not enough (is floor surface directly in contact to the ground, or the ceiling of the basement floor?). Moreover, for Buildings LOD4, 2 BoundarySurfaces of different rooms (FloorSurface or Room 1 and CeilingSurface of Room2) may corresponds to a unique ThermalBoundarySurface (IntermediaryFloor).

Presently in the Energy ADE v0.5, the ThermalBoundarySurfaceType Codelist is uncomplete and not fully clear.

For the Building LOD4, we should introduced:

Further proposed specifications of existing ThermalBoundarySurfaceType:

Concerning the roof, flat roofs and pitched roofs obviously don't have the same constructions (as well as copular). However, should we distinguish them in the ThermalBoundarySurfaceType? or should we only right Roof, and the constructions could be deduced from the roof type for instance?

PRemmen commented 8 years ago

I propose to have all of the listed ThermalBoundarySurfaceType's in this issue. From my point of view we only need one Type Roof because we can seperate them by inclination so to conclude my suggestion:

RomainNouvel commented 8 years ago

Agree!