Open maxnoe opened 10 months ago
Is an option really needed for this? I would think the default behavior should just be updated to not duplicate an OB if it already exists.
Is an option really needed for this? I would think the default behavior should just be updated to not duplicate an OB if it already exists.
That could be done, yes. Depends a bit on the use case, e.g. we might want to check for uniqueness of obs_id and error out if not single_ob
to prevent people from merging the same file twice or merging two simulation files that are different but have the same run number
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
4a45dcd
) 92.46% compared to head (4c334bf
) 92.46%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Needed for merging of observations that are stored in multiple chunks into one final file for the OB.
TODO: