ask 20240126_v0.10.4_src6_dec2276_tuned production

[alvmas]

# New Prod config Self check-list: - [x] I have checked the lstchain config, in particular for: - [x] `az_tel` instead of `sin_az_tel` if data to be analyzed have been produced with lstchain <= v0.9.7 - [x] "increase_nsb" and "increase_psf" are provided in "image_modifier" (if used) - [x] I have checked the environment in the lstmcpipe config and it is the one used to analyse DL>1 data - [x] I have provided the command (in README), or script (in additionnal .py file) used to produce the lstmcpipe config New Prod Config ## Prod_ID 20240126_v0.10.4_src6_dec2276_tuned ## Short description of the config Config for the processing of MC at dec_2276 with NSB tuning to src6 and src-dependent configuration using a specific NSB tunning for the source. ## Why this config is needed Reprocess the data at declination 22.76 with version of lstchain v0.10.4 and with new tunning for new source: src6.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (163698a) 31.78% compared to head (9d5e49b) 31.78%. Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #447 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 31.78% 31.78% ======================================= Files 46 46 Lines 2850 2850 ======================================= Hits 906 906 Misses 1944 1944 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vuillaut]

@alvmas there is a missing coma line 168 of lstchain config in the energy regression features, to fix

[vuillaut]

Prod started 🚀 @alvmas The cluster is quite busy at the moment with the school and many analyses running so it could take a few days. I will let you know.