cta-observatory / lstmcpipe

Scripts to analyse MC files on LST cluster at La Palma
https://cta-observatory.github.io/lstmcpipe/
MIT License
7 stars 15 forks source link

add new production for src3 with tuned NSB for moon data analysis #463

Closed joteros closed 6 months ago

joteros commented 6 months ago
# New Prod config Self check-list: - [X] I have checked the lstchain config, in particular for: - [X] `az_tel` instead of `sin_az_tel` if data to be analyzed have been produced with lstchain <= v0.9.7 - [X] "increase_nsb" and "increase_psf" are provided in "image_modifier" (if used) - [X] I have checked the environment in the lstmcpipe config and it is the one used to analyse DL>1 data - [X] I have provided the command (in README), or script (in additionnal .py file) used to produce the lstmcpipe config ## Prod_ID 20240426_v0.10.9_src3_dec3476_4822_tunedNSB ## Short description of the config Config for a source with dec within 3476/4822 and NSB tuning: "image_modifier": { "increase_nsb": true, "extra_noise_in_dim_pixels": 6.974, "extra_bias_in_dim_pixels": 1.825, "transition_charge": 8, "extra_noise_in_bright_pixels": 4.195 } lstmcpipe_generate_config PathConfigAllSkyFull --prod_id 20240426_v0.10.9_src3_dec3476_4822_tunedNSB --dec_list dec_3476 dec_4822 ## Why this config is needed See wiki page (src 3) https://www.lst1.iac.es/wiki/index.php/MC_analysis_and_IRF_production#lstmcpipe_productions
codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 32.01%. Comparing base (897c327) to head (2c23774). Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #463 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 31.56% 32.01% +0.44% ========================================== Files 46 46 Lines 2892 2936 +44 ========================================== + Hits 913 940 +27 - Misses 1979 1996 +17 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

vuillaut commented 6 months ago

Prod started 🚀

morcuended commented 5 months ago

@vuillaut, it seems that some jobs from this prod did not finish correctly, can you please check?

vuillaut commented 5 months ago

hi @morcuended , could you be more specific please? I don't see any job from this prod pending or in fail and I can see the DL2 have been produced

morcuended commented 5 months ago

Indeed, my bad, those other pending jobs were from another prod. Files from this one look good. Thanks!