At the start of section 4, note 2 says:
"NOTE2: A CMAF Chunk conforms to a CMAF Fragment."
However I don't believe this is true in general. CMAF places many constraints on CMAF Fragments, including starting with a suitable random access point, being independently decodable from other fragments (ie not relying on data in the preceding one) and alignment with Fragment boundaries in other tracks within a switching set.
The note is only expected to be true for the case of a CMAF Fragment consisting of only a single CMAF chunk.
I'm not sure whether it was intended to say something different? For example "A CMAF Chunk can also be a CMAF Fragment"? If not then the note should be removed.
At the start of section 4, note 2 says: "NOTE2: A CMAF Chunk conforms to a CMAF Fragment."
However I don't believe this is true in general. CMAF places many constraints on CMAF Fragments, including starting with a suitable random access point, being independently decodable from other fragments (ie not relying on data in the preceding one) and alignment with Fragment boundaries in other tracks within a switching set.
The note is only expected to be true for the case of a CMAF Fragment consisting of only a single CMAF chunk.
I'm not sure whether it was intended to say something different? For example "A CMAF Chunk can also be a CMAF Fragment"? If not then the note should be removed.