Closed StephenRicher closed 3 years ago
Hi Stephen,
Technically this sounds OK, but it could be a bit hard to interpret. Normal GSEA gives you a direction of change (up- or down- regulation), but in your case it would be a de-regulation. Still, some benchmarks are showing that deregulation statistic actually gives a better ranking and a better control for false-positives, compared to directional statistics and may be even should be the preferred option.
Hi @assaron,
Ok thanks very much, I will proceed with caution!
Hi,
I have been using Sleuth to compute transcript level abundance and differential expression. The transcript-level p-values can be aggregated to compute differentially expressed genes and I would be interested to feed these genes into fgsea.
The issue is I only have the p-values to go by, as opposed to other directional test-statistics. As I understand, the reasoning for not providing gene-level abundances is because transcripts of the same gene may go up and down, (or cancel each other other) and so direction is not so meaningful after aggregation.
I know something similar has been raised before (#47) and I know since then is the a new scoreType option. My idea was to rank by -log(pvalue) and using scoreType='pos' to use fgsea with raw aggregated p-values. Would this be an appropriate method?
Thanks very much and for developing such a great tool, Stephen