This would be one of last "frameworks" I would like to use

[DanielGarcia2060]

• You are basically using the same css syntax and adding a lot of clutter to it.
• There is no solution proposed to most of the real world problems on css, just a "new" way to type css
  • I don't see the value of paying for it

Can you please explain Why is this a good idea? and What is the purpose of this thing?

[chhuang]

Please explains what is this? How is this different from Bootstrap? Sparing the keystrokes is not helping people to understand the idea behind this great work.

[fetchTe]

@DanielGarcia2060 I've moved away from the token subscription model - it was more or less wishful thinking. Nonetheless, ctr is a CSS framework with built in object oriented functionality to allow for a rich hierarchy of inherited CSS components so that it's not require to list each class in your HTML every single time. This functionality is encompassed through the class feature of ctr. However, in order to accomplish true object oriented functionality there has to be a supporting framework and that is what ctr provides. To better understand why this is advantageous you have to understand the basic premise of OOCSS as well as supporting concepts like extend.

[fetchTe]

Yeah, @chhuang sorry, I now realize I did a pretty shitty job the first time around trying to explain ctr in a succinct manner. But I rewrote the README description and would love to hear if it helps you better understand the idea.