Closed ghost closed 10 years ago
what's the standard practice? LICENSE.md? Some other flag in github?
FYI the NuGet page has always linked to http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
It's good to at least have a license file in the repo, and it doesn't hurt to call it out in the readme. I filed the issue because I poked around for a bit and didn't find a license and assumed other people may struggle with a similar problem.
Love the project btw. 😃
From: Chrismailto:notifications@github.com Sent: ‎7/‎1/‎2014 7:12 PM To: ctstone/csredismailto:csredis@noreply.github.com Cc: Tom Whitemailto:Tom.White@outlook.com Subject: Re: [csredis] Missing License? (#11)
what's the standard practice? LICENSE.md? Some other flag in github?
FYI the NuGet page has always linked to http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ctstone/csredis/issues/11#issuecomment-47730436
License file added
It looks like there isn't an OSS License applied to this project. It's best practice to display what license you want to protect this work under.