Open DougCube opened 21 hours ago
Howdy!
If you know the optimal length beforehand you can stop it from printing suboptimal solutions using the --maxdepth option.
With the -c option, sometimes you get more than you asked for if you multithread, because I don't actually not print a solution when it would be too many since maybe that solution is actually useful and I hate to throw away work done. But if you think it's better than I go ahead and make the -c strict, I could do that. (There's no reasonable way to stop a thread that's searching, so sometimes a thread finds a solution after a previous one has been found and before that thread realizes it's time to stop searching.)
I can definitely see how "all optimal" might be useful and it's likely easy enough to add . . .
-tom
On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 10:44 PM DougCube @.***> wrote:
I notice that without additonal options, it usually prints a single (and I assume optimal) solution but sometimes it prints 2 or more solutions at the same depth (curious when and why it does this). But I want it to instead print all solutions of the optimal depth. I tried using "-c num" option but then get some suboptimal solutions in addition to optimal ones.
Is there some option to force it to print all optimal solutions?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cubing/twsearch/issues/66, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMOLSZDDSL3LCZEIDFYNOT2CLBMDAVCNFSM6AAAAABSNHDBW6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGY4DSMZYGQ3DMMI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
--
Yes, I do think that would be a really valueable feature to add. Hopefully not too difficult to do. In addition to throw away solutions in threads that returned a suboptimal solution.
I notice that without additonal options, it usually prints a single (and I assume optimal) solution but sometimes it prints 2 or more solutions at the same depth (curious when and why it does this). But I want it to instead print all solutions of the optimal depth. I tried using "-c num" option but then get some suboptimal solutions in addition to optimal ones.
Is there some option to force it to print all optimal solutions?