Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
1) The parser may not use any time zone because it contradicts with the YAML
specification: http://yaml.org/type/timestamp.html
"If the time zone is omitted, the timestamp is assumed to be specified in UTC."
But if you want to use your time zone, you can extend SnakeYAML and provide
your own way to parse dates. Check an example with JodaTime:
http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml/source/browse/#hg%2Fsrc%2Ftest%2Fjava%2Fexamp
les%2Fjodatime
2) No problem to introduce time zone for dumper. Check the source and the
latest 1.10-SNAPSHOT
http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml/source/browse/src/test/java/org/yaml/snakeyam
l/issues/issue141/ConfigurableTimezoneTest.java
Original comment by py4fun@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 11:38
"If the time zone is omitted, the timestamp is assumed to be specified in UTC."
Quite a weird requirement for the markup language that positions itself to be
human-editable. But OK. Spec is spec.
Thanks for the directions anyway! I am going to violate the spec right now,
cause I'm human :)
Original comment by yaro...@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 1:23
You do not violate the spec if you parse the YAML document in your own way.
This is how it should be and that is why SnakeYAML tries to be as flexible as
possible. But you cannot ask from a general-purpose tool to behave in your
specific way because other users may have different expectations. These
expectations are frozen in a spec. When the limitation are known and agreed all
the deviations are under control.
(By the way my expectation is that without the time zone it must be UTC.
Otherwise the very same document parsed in different places gets different
dates.)
Does it work for you ? Can I close the issue ?
Original comment by py4fun@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 1:37
Yes, you can close the issue. Thanks again for the help!
(If the document is meant to travel the world it should specify timezones
explicitly. That's for sure. On the other hand it is common practice to
interpret dates and times without specified timezone relative to local time. I
can't even recall any other tool that falls back to UTC for that purpose.
That's why I think it is weird. Especially for the data being filled in by
human, not dumped by software. But spec is spec. Your tool is great!)
Original comment by yaro...@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 2:59
It will be available in version 1.10
Original comment by py4fun@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 3:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yaro...@gmail.com
on 3 Feb 2012 at 7:43