search

cujojs / most

Ultra-high performance reactive programming
MIT License
3.49k stars 231 forks source link

Add flow definitions #478

Closed TrySound closed 7 years ago

briancavalier commented 7 years ago

Thanks @TrySound! I started looking through this a bit tonight. I should be able to get through all of it over the next few days.

TrySound commented 7 years ago

I think we can keep array definitions as is and maybe extend them when somebody will leave an issue.

briancavalier commented 7 years ago

After thinking about this a bit more, I agree, @TrySound. The current flow array defs match the TS defs, for better or for worse, at least they are consistent. It'd also be a breaking change in 1.x to remove the catch-all TS variants, so I think we just go with it in 1.x and think ahead to a better solution for 2.x.