Closed cullophid closed 8 years ago
Nice. I think it would look nicer if the heading names in the left-hand column were just the name of the function and the proper Haskell notation was the heading on the actual page with the info. Several of the type sigs are truncated as it is so it makes more sense to have them in the place with more screen real estate.
I have added the changes from https://github.com/cullophid/date-fp/pull/24
@svozza I agree I have removed the type sig from the summary, and moved it to functions headers
Looks great and a definite improvement on my PR, we get nice links and informative type sigs with no losses.
Do you need to add gitbooks to the devDependencies?
@svozza yes the gitbook get build as part of the deploy step
I have moved our docs to a gitbook
This makes them easier to read, and allows users to search for at function.