The em:hasRelation showing Friesland_ADM1_2755812_geonames as part of Netherlands_PCLI_2750405_geonames has an incorrect value for em:relationType at line 20496: it is recorded as em:P_PART_OF_A, but should be em:A_PART_OF_A.
At the time of writing, I don't know if this is throughout the data - I suspect it is: I may have failed to take account of the type of the place for which the relation is described.
I just noticed a problem with some data generated by the geonames extractor/converter.
E.g., see: https://github.com/culturesofknowledge/emplaces/blob/master/src/geonamesdataexport/data-20190624/geonames-data-ref-by-EMLO-0001-0100.ttl#L20467
The
em:hasRelationshowingFriesland_ADM1_2755812_geonamesas part ofNetherlands_PCLI_2750405_geonameshas an incorrect value forem:relationTypeat line 20496: it is recorded asem:P_PART_OF_A, but should beem:A_PART_OF_A.At the time of writing, I don't know if this is throughout the data - I suspect it is: I may have failed to take account of the type of the place for which the relation is described.
Code for this is at about:
https://github.com/culturesofknowledge/emplaces/blob/master/src/geonamesdataexport/get_geonames_data.py#L865
It does appear that the relationship type is hard-wired, rather than being derived based on the place type.