Closed mark-dce closed 1 month ago
RATIONALE The SolrDocument model was not completely covered by the test suite.
I also noticed that the presenter bypassed the model and pulled data directly from the document hash.
This change also displays the Proquest Submission Date to admin users.
coverage: 96.552% (+0.1%) from 96.449% when pulling 101c1ddc110b28be1b0ca72cbfb17ee0280cdb38 on add_coverage into 634c53077c99e9fb3b439b12be185e6ab640d069 on main.
RATIONALE The SolrDocument model was not completely covered by the test suite.
I also noticed that the presenter bypassed the model and pulled data directly from the document hash.
This change also displays the Proquest Submission Date to admin users.