Closed ppeterpp closed 8 months ago
The released pre-trained weight is exactly the one we used for evaluation in our paper. And the config is used to train this weight.
we modified your test.py to gen full val set and bicubic upsample followed by pad top, as described in another issue. Then we swap the gen val set to nus and do cvt & bevfusion validation without modifying the downstream codes. could there be any thing wrong in our practice, please shed some light!
As your descriptions seem to match our paper, they are correct. Please look into more details to discover any possible issues in your implementation. Otherwise, please wait patiently for our future updates.
If this is the answer you want, there is no special trick in our evaluation (e.g., we used all scenes from the val dataset and all boxes). Sorry, I cannot help you with such a general question. I will close this issue.
If you have any specific problems, please open other issues and post them there, just like others did.
Hi! Images generated via weights released led to worse reported numbers compared to those in the paper, may I ask how many epochs of training required for reproduction, and the epochs you have trained for your released weights, thanks.