[Question 1] - What does s stand for in s_begin, s_end? Similarly, what does r stand for in r_begin and r_end?
[Question 2] - What is the difference between label_len and pred_len? In my opinion, these 2 seq len must be equal, why you use 2 seprate variables to define them?
[Question 3] - Regarding the following 2 expressions, which one is correct?
seq_len = x_train_seq_len + label_seq_len (seq_len not only contains X, but also contain label)
seq_len = x_train_seq_len (seq_len only contain X, but not contain label)
[Question 4] - According to the above code, given:
Does about seq_x and seq_y means that you want to use 0-8 data to forecasting the 4-12 data? It makes me confused because 4-8 data is known in seq_x, why do we need to forecasting? Only 9-12 is unknown for seq_x so we need to forecast.
However, in my opinion, I think below should be the correct seq_x and seq_y:
Hi,
Good day! I have some concerns about the below getitem code for SCINet/data_process/etth_dataloader.py::Dataset_ETT_hour:
[Question 1] - What does
s
stand for ins_begin
,s_end
? Similarly, what doesr
stand for inr_begin
andr_end
? [Question 2] - What is the difference between label_len and pred_len? In my opinion, these 2 seq len must be equal, why you use 2 seprate variables to define them? [Question 3] - Regarding the following 2 expressions, which one is correct? seq_len = x_train_seq_len + label_seq_len (seq_len not only contains X, but also contain label) seq_len = x_train_seq_len (seq_len only contain X, but not contain label) [Question 4] - According to the above code, given:we can get below result:
Does about seq_x and seq_y means that you want to use 0-8 data to forecasting the 4-12 data? It makes me confused because 4-8 data is known in seq_x, why do we need to forecasting? Only 9-12 is unknown for seq_x so we need to forecast.
However, in my opinion, I think below should be the correct seq_x and seq_y:
because it means that I want to use 0-8 data to forecasting 9-12 data.
I am looking forward to your reply regarding this piece of code, thanks a lot.