Add support for simpler HTTP requests

[theolivenbaum]

Idea: https://github.com/mikeal/bent

[ChrML]

I would rather recommend implementing the .NET http client patterns:

• HttpClient
• IHttpClientFactory
• The extension methods for JSON etc.

Much more compatible with existing .NET code, and can also be written as oneliners async/await for getting data.

[theolivenbaum]

True! And simple enough to hide the abstraction! Will give it some thought

• or would you like to give it a try?

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, 9:35 PM Christian Myhre Lundheim < @.***> wrote:

I would rather recommend implementing the .NET http client patterns:

• HttpClient
• IHttpClientFactory
• The extension methods for JSON etc.

Much more compatible with existing .NET code, and can also be written as oneliners async/await for getting data.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/theolivenbaum/h5/issues/35#issuecomment-807437369, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDCOAZVXOT2S47OPTAZVE3TFOM7RANCNFSM4ZXUSRAA .

[ChrML]

I have implemented dependency injection patterns, and an API-client that is very easy to use in my library for Bridge.NET: https://github.com/ChrML/Bridge.Jolt

I think this front-end library has very many great ideas in one place for very simple front-end development, but it will eventually have to be ported to H5.

Not come around for the HttpClient part yet. But it makes sense that System.Net.Http is a part of H5's core features, since it's used a lot in frontends, and also a part of standard .NET.

[theolivenbaum]

Nice!

If you want to try porting, the effort will be a simple find and replace:

Bridge -> H5 Retyped -> H5.Core

And fully replacing the csproj file with a modern one with the right Nuget packages.

[theolivenbaum]

Closed with initial implementation in PR #61