As of release 6M62, there seems to be a bug with displaying things in assemblies whose parents have printed names.
Usually, printing the ownership text describes the name of the related object; however, for an unknown reason, assigning the owner a printed name seems to override this, printing its kind? A minimal example:
A witch is a kind of person. A pimple is a kind of thing.
Every witch carries a pimple (called her wart).
The Coven Commons is a room.
Esther is a witch and here.
Agatha is a witch and here. The printed name of Agatha is "The Grand High Witch".
>x esther's wart
You see nothing special about Esther's wart.
>x agatha's wart
You see nothing special about The Grand High Witch's pimple.
>showme
Coven Commons - room
yourself - person
Esther - witch
Esther's wart - pimple
The Grand High Witch - witch
The Grand High Witch's pimple - pimple
(In this example, ‘pimple’ and ‘wart’ are synonyms; in e.g. complex machines with identical components differentiated by name, it might not be so!)
As of release 6M62, there seems to be a bug with displaying things in assemblies whose parents have printed names.
Usually, printing the ownership text describes the name of the related object; however, for an unknown reason, assigning the owner a printed name seems to override this, printing its kind? A minimal example:
>x esther's wart You see nothing special about Esther's wart. >x agatha's wart You see nothing special about The Grand High Witch's pimple. >showme Coven Commons - room yourself - person Esther - witch Esther's wart - pimple The Grand High Witch - witch The Grand High Witch's pimple - pimple(In this example, ‘pimple’ and ‘wart’ are synonyms; in e.g. complex machines with identical components differentiated by name, it might not be so!)
imported from: Cosmetic bug with assemblies and printed names