I know the dataflow language is not well-supported in IntelliJ given it’s a bit…different. However, I’ve largely had no issues with Cursive’s current support (except indentation).
That said, I’m seeing variable resolution issues within <<switch blocks—
Everything defined/bound outside the <<switch block is fine. Anything within fails to resolve.
The *ret-val side of this is also a bit weird since in Clojure it wouldn’t be in scope outside the block anyway (but in Rama dataflow, it gets unified).
I know the dataflow language is not well-supported in IntelliJ given it’s a bit…different. However, I’ve largely had no issues with Cursive’s current support (except indentation).
That said, I’m seeing variable resolution issues within
<<switchblocks—Everything defined/bound outside the
<<switchblock is fine. Anything within fails to resolve.The
*ret-valside of this is also a bit weird since in Clojure it wouldn’t be in scope outside the block anyway (but in Rama dataflow, it gets unified).Not a showstopper for me—just distracting.